Monday, 31 October 2016

Studio Brief 02 - Primary Research


To help inform my design process, I went out to Tesco to have a look at different confectionery packaging.

 I noticed that a lot of the sweet, chocolate based goods used particularly rounded fonts.
The first product I looked at was the Kinder Bueno bar. Whilst the brand name 'Kinder' is in a basic, sans serif typeface, the 'bueno' part of the text is in a curved, playful style type.
I felt this was effective as it adds an element of fun - it is relaxed and easygoing and looks attractive against the plain white background. I also really like the added 'sheen' on the letters, giving them a 3D, stand-out effect which links in with the actual chocolate bar itself.























I then looked at the Tesco own brand milk chocolate cookies, which have a significantly more basic and simple packaging than the Bueno. Only 3 colours are used with no imagery aside from a simple
pattern. The font used is sans serif, but is very curved and plump with rounded terminals. I feel this     particular typeface is effective as it's bold and engaging without being too much and doesn't need         any extra serifs or ornamentals.




Maltesers are another great example of a sans serif, rounded typeface. Using a similar technique to the Kinder Bueno, the letters have a slight shadow to them, giving them a 3D style effect. This seems a popular effect within confectionery packaging, and I think this is because it almost relates to the actual product itself - making the type into a three-dimensional 'item' to match with the goods themselves.





Whilst Wispa does not have this 3D effect, it is again a very chunky, rounded style font that is lacking any serifs. This particular typeface is very bold and striking, which helps attract the customer's eye and 'seduce' them into buying the product. I really like the extra outlines around the lettering as they add another dimension to the text and help it stand out against the gold background.

 


This research has been very beneficial in helping further my design ideas - I am now more aware of the typefaces already present within the market, so I am able to use this to my advantage whilst creating my own ideas.

Studio Brief 02 - Chosen Word and Typeface



For this brief, we were told we could pick an adjective of our choice to base our typeface around. I began looking at different adjectives that I thought may work well.

My shortlist came down to three adjectives:

- Aromatic
- Glazed
- Plump

To help me decide which word would be best, I decided to do a quick experiment with each word and one of the typefaces given to us, Clarendon. The reason I picked Clarendon for this experiment as I felt it the most to play with out of all the typefaces. I took each work and adapted it slightly to visually portray it's meaning. I tried to make the 'glazed' appear as if it had been poured over with a coating or icing by making the serifs softer, removing the counters and thickening the strokes.
I then took aromatic and exaggerated the serifs, swirling and curling them to demonstrate a floating 'aroma'. Finally, I took the adjective plump and almost inflated this, thickening the strokes and round the serifs. I personally felt that the most successful experiment was the 'plump' one and it definitely made me realise that this was a word I could play around with and push further. See fig1 below for examples.

 fig1.

Following this experiment, I decided to use Clarendon as my starting typeface as I liked the serifs and general character of the font. I do plan on experiment with a variety of typefaces though, as I don't want to limit myself to one.


Wednesday, 26 October 2016

Studio Brief 02 - Typeface Research



Our new studio brief is to create our own typeface. We have been given nine typefaces to work with as our starting point, based on Joseph Muller-Brockmann's typeface choices. These are:

- Garamond
- Caslon
- Baskerville
- Bodoni
- Clarendon
- Berthold
- Times
- Helvetica
- Univers

We then have to chose and adjective or emotive word to base our work around. We can create the typeface in upper or lowercase and it has to work together in endless combinations with a harmonious sequence.

Garamond:
- Created by French punch-cutter Claude Garamond
- Today's Garamond based around modern interpretations of the punches of Claude
- Garamond was the first to deviate from purely handwritten style letters to make a typeface read better when printed
- Letterforms thin and delicate
- Orante and decorative
- Large counters in a/e
- Horizontal crossbar
- Long ascenders and descenders
- Used in Harry Potter and Dr Seuss books, Google's original logo, Abercrombie & Fitch logo, etc

Bodoni:
- Designed by Giambattista Bodoni, Italy, in early 19th century
- Highly influenced by geometry
- Romantic style typeface
- Extreme contrasts between thick & thin strokes
- Subtly bracketed serifs
- Long ascenders and descenders
- Ornate appearance

Times New Roman:
- Similar to Plantin
- Sharper serifs, higher contrast with stroke weights
- Short ascenders and descenders
- Bracketed sharp serifs

Helvetica:
- Most neutral typeface
- Swiss style
- Clarity, precision, objectivity
- Large x-height
- 'O' - oval rather than circular
- Lowercase a - double story
- A is in teardrop shape

Caslon:
- Characterized by short ascenders and descenders
- Bracketed serifs
- High contrast

Baskerville:
- Transitional typeface
- In between classical and high contrast typefaces
- Elegant in larger text sizes
- Fairly light appearance

Clarendon:
- Slab serif
- Vertical stress
- Tall x-height
- Short ascenders and descenders
- Strong bracketed serifs

Berthold:
- Also named Akzidenz-Grotesk
- Tail of Q does not cross circle
- J does not descend below baseline
- Middle of M descends to baseline
- Double story A

Univers:
- Squaring of round strokes
- Diagonal strokes of k meet at stem
- Two storied A

Monday, 24 October 2016

Studio Brief 01 - Evaluation


I decided to place my favourite logotype design into context to see if it worked, as this was a key step in helping me realize my previous design did not work. I personally felt it worked really effectively within the context; it looked very simple but had at the same time had a high visual impact. I liked the pop of colour used as it helped my company stand out whilst also adding an element of light-heartedness rather than sticking to a uniform, serious black and white. I felt this logotype was appropriate to my company as demonstrated the idea of efficiency and forwardness, without any ‘faff’ or frills. I wanted my company to be portrayed as a ‘no-nonsense’ business that is straight to the point but also approachable and friendly, and I feel my logotype definitely portrays this. The sans serif typeface helps prevent the company coming across as too formal and serious, whilst the simplistic aesthetic emphasizes the functionality and performance.

I think my initial approach the brief was quite naïve and I felt I strayed too far away from the company ethos – I definitely should have looked at this more to help guide my design decisions. I believe I got carried away by adding imagery and texture that did not suit the company’s purpose and did not appeal to my target audience. After placing these designs into context this became apparent to me, so I am glad I took that step as it helped me look at my logotype in a different way. Once I stripped my logo back to basics and worked with the company’s focus and purpose at the forefront of my mind, I was able to design a more appropriate and effective logo that had a much better visual impact.

The main skill I have learnt during this brief is to always have a clear focus in your head before you begin designing – know your target audience, know your focus and know what you want to portray. I have learnt that this is a crucial factor in helping a project develop successfully. I have also learnt more about typeface terminology and what helps make up a logotype, which will help me in future life as I develop as young designer.












Studio Brief 01 - Crit Response



Following today's crit, I have taken the feedback received into consideration and redeveloped my logotype.

I changed from using the lightening bolt version to the plain type version with the tittles missing. I tried this out in a yellow and light orange colour, which I quite liked. I also put this text onto a coloured background (see fig1 below). I definitely prefer these designs and think they are lot more appropriate for my target market than my previous design. My new design is more modern and contemporary and also suits an adult audience better.


fig1.

Studio Brief 01 - Final Crit



Today we have had the final crit for this particular project and I presented my final ideas to my peer group.

I picked out my five final designs and presented these on a sheet together (see fig1 below). My own particular favourite was the one with the two 'S's in yellow as I felt this had a quirky element without being too over the top. I wasn't too bothered about my logo being incredibly modern or contemporary as this didn't suit my particular target market, which was quite open. An electrical parts company has a mainly adult market but has no specific age range or gender so I felt using a slight quirk might help keep it attractive to a larger market.

The immediate feedback I received was that this was not the best design - one person said that if I was going to use the yellow hand-drawn lettering, it would definitely look better as the 'I's rather than the 'S's. People were also unsure as to why I had chosen to include these 'S's rather than just using normal type. I explained how I felt it added an extra 'selling point' as such but they responded by saying it just appeared too childish and inappropriate for the target market. I had not thought of this until it was said but I can see now how that would be perceived.













fig1.




Fig2 below shows my favourite chosen final design in a variety of styles - both thick and thin 'S's and a black and white option. I created these to demonstrate how the design can work in grayscale as well colour, yet people immediately said it looked better in black and white. Again, this shocked me as I personally felt it looked better in colour.

 fig2.


I also put my designs into context so it was easier to get an idea of what it would look like in the correct setting. I used a few basic mock up packaging images and simply placed my logotype over the top and also superimposed it onto a shop front sign (see fig3 below). People asked me why it had to be a white packaging used - it didn't, this was just purely for the sake of showcasing the logo on some packaging. They suggested I put more thought into this - would it look better on black with white text? Or maybe even a yellow background?

fig3.


Overall, the feedback was that my best design was the simple one where I had removed the tittle off the 'i'.  They said this was clean and simple and made the brand appear trustworthy and safe.
There were suggestions of potentially making this more oblique, but this could cause problems for signage etc. Brands such as Maplin and Clas Ohlson were suggested for me to look at - a similar focus to my company and similar design. People also recommended that I tried the font in an ultra light thin version and review the outcome.

This feedback has been suprising but very useful and it has certainly made me look at my own work in a different way.

Studio Brief 01- Milton Keynes Gallery Rebrand



In 2011, designer and artist Sara De Bondt rebranded the popular Milton Keynes Gallery.
This included a full redesign using bright colours on a large scale over three facades on the exterior of the building. These large graphics are hand painted and are made from a combination of patterned coloured squares using hatched, dotted and solid finishes.  See images below for example.

The name of the gallery was also rebranded to MK Gallery with a contraction of the letters M and K to form one singe letter. The website was also redesigned with a new typeface and colour palette as well as a new grid layout.

Personally I think this rebrand works really well due to its simplicity - basic primary colours are used which stops things from being overcomplicated whilst also embracing white open space. The typefaces used are simple and legible yet the variety keeps things interesting and upbeat.
The ideas and design used are very simplistic yet this is the reason it is so effective - you get the impression that this a contemporary, exciting and modern gallery that displays a variety of different works - demonstrated by the variety of typefaces and colours incorporated within the design.


  

                                          

Friday, 21 October 2016

Studio Brief 01 - Helvetica Analysis



Helvetica is typeface that we see around us more than any other. Many designers have described it as hard to evaluate, referring to it as 'air' - it is just 'there'. In the 1950's Helvetica was part of a development in graphic design, based around idealism with strong influences from the Swiss style. Helvetica is a rational typeface, and these rational typefaces need to be two things - intelligible and legible.

Helvetica is clear, readable and straightforward. It is known for its horizontal terminals - the letters appear to be 'sliced off' in a clean, crisp and refreshing way. Designers often say Helvetica is hard to improve, describing it as 'exactly right'.

Helvetica came as a breath of fresh air after the fancy, frilly ads of the 50s - gone was the handwritten, script based style type, instead replaced by a neutral and efficient typeface that was straight to the point and incredibly powerful.

Companies such as the EPA use Helvetica, which is down to it's accessibility, transparency and accountability. Designers like the idea that the typeface itself shares the same ideals as their company.
It has been said that Helvetica uses the perfect balance of push and pull, creating a harmony and smoothness that almost makes it relatable to us as humans.

There is an argument that Helvetica is the typeface of capitalism - it is everywhere we go, on everything we see, helps to advertise and sell products etc.. but others argue that it is actually the typeface of socialism - it is important within our community, it is integrated within our social lives, it has almost become a part of us.

The most important thing about Helvetica is that it is still fresh over 50 years since its creation - it is still widely used and highly regarded within the world of graphic design. Anyone in the world, even someone who isn't a designer could use Helvetica in the right way and still produce a very successful piece of work.

10 key features of Helvetica:
- Simple
- Clean
- Powerful
- Balance
- Neutral
- Efficient
- Accessible
- Refreshing
- Crisp
- Clear


Panasonic logo:


Panasonic is a multinational electronics manufacturer. Their logo simply features the name of the brand in Helvetica. The use of a capital 'P' gives the brand a sense of importance and instantly draws the eye in. Tight kerning is used but the letters are not touching, which helps keep the brand name legible and intelligible. The dark blue colour is very appropriate for this specific company as it represents a sense of the modern world and technology and almost has connotations of electricity. This helps keep the logo engaging without being too 'in your face' as such. I think the logo communicates the brand as a no-nonsense, efficient electrical company that is simple yet very accessible.


American Airlines logo:


American Airlines has recently rebranded itself and now uses a variation of Frutiger as its typeface. Before this, American Airlines had the same logo for over 40 years, designed by Massimo Vignelli, using Helvetica. The use of Helvetica in this context gives the brand an almost regal feel - combined with the imagery above, you get the impression that this is a high-end, luxury airline company with a history. The fairly tight kerning used keeps the name legible whilst also very structured. There is no space between the two words but this is kept intelligible by the difference in colour - the red and blue separates the type up and helps us distinguish between the two words. The colours used are that of the American flag, which helps keep the brand connected to its roots and main focus - being American.
Both words are capitalised, which emphasises a power that the company has and gives it a luxury, professional appearance. The logo communicates the brand as crisp and clear company that has is of high importance.


Oral-B logo:


Oral-B is a company that sells oral hygiene products. The oblique/italic style of Helvetica gives the logo a sense of movement - this implies the company is dynamic and could also be reminiscent of the act of brushing your teeth. The kerning is mixed between letters as there is a ligature between the 'r' and the 'a' yet the other letters are not touching. The hyphen is also touching the 'B', and again this puts an emphasis on movement and makes the logo less rigid and stationary.
The uppercase letters used imply the company's importance and responsibility as a healthcare product. Similarly, the colours used reinforce this. The particular shade of blue used is very commonly associated with healthcare and medical practice, and this reassures the consumer that this is a trustworthy brand.


Fendi logo:

Fendi is an Italian luxury fashion company. The use of uppercase for the entire logo immediately gives the brand a sense of luxury and importance. The kerning is neither tight nor lose, which makes the logo appear very structured and stable, again highlighting its importance as a brand. The fact that no colours are used makes the company appear very straightforward and crisp - no frills, ornamentals or fancy colours are needed to make you pay attention to or respect the brand. The rotated 'F's add an extra aesthetic element and also act as a logo alongside the name of the company, making the brand more recognisable. There is a balance between the kerning of the letters and the capitalisation, creating a simple yet efficient visual. The typeface used helps communicate the brand in a luxurious way and gives it that sense of power and importance.

Tuesday, 18 October 2016

Studio Brief 01 - Interim Crit



Today we have had an interim crit in which everyone left their work out with a comments sheet alongside to receive feedback on as everyone walked round and looked at each other's work.

The two design sheets I left out for people to view were my most recent designs, including ones I was considering for my final design (see fig1 & fig2 below). I also asked 4 questions on my feedback sheet -
Upper or lowercase?
Lightening bolt for 'S', 'I' or 'N'?
Loose or tight kerning?
Colours?

fig1.                                                                           fig2.
 

See fig3 below for the feedback I received.

 fig3.

The general consensus for the case of the type was lowercase - everyone who gave me feedback said lower, and someone even stated 'uppercase looks too bold - not friendly'.  This confirmed to me that I am definitely going to have my logotype in lowercase.

The feedback I received for the lightening bolt question was mixed. A large majority of people said 'I', or just one 'I' - but a few people also said no bolt at all. I disagree with the idea of having no bolt at all as I feel like this was the main focus of the design and helped demonstrate the purpose of the company. I was surprised by this but will take it into consideration. Also, I was shocked by the fact no one said 'S', as this was my personal favourite variation. I will definitely need to review this for my final design.

Everyone said to have tight kerning, and a few specifically stated tight but not touching. I received one comment in particular - 'Definitely tight! Tighter kerning suggests faster transmission speed'. I thought this was an interesting idea with a very good point - would tighter kerning give a better impression of my brand to potential customers?

For the colours question, the general opinion was to keep it monochrome/black and white. Someone said this 'looks more professional', which I agree with to an extent. There was a few suggestions for a hint of yellow - I like this idea and feel it could work well without being too over the top. I also had a suggestion of electric blue - this would be interesting to try out and see how it looks.

Overall I felt this crit was very useful - it has given me a few more ideas and definitely made me reconsider my designs. Getting a variety of different opinions has been really informative and will definitely help me refine my ideas.







Studio Brief 01 - Crit Review



Today we have had a group crit in which I demonstrated my inital ideas to a small group of my peers.

Below (see fig1) is a design sheet of my very first initial ideas for my logotype. I began by trying out different cases and kerning widths to see which worked best. I felt like the uppercase type with wide kerning gave off a very powerful, strong aesthetic but I wasn't sure this was a bit too masculine.
The tighter kerning made the type slightly softer but I still felt it looked too structured.
I didn't feel it worked with a mixed case as it made the word appear as two rather than one, which is not the desired effect I wanted. I combined the two 'S's to create a sense of flow and movement but discovered this looked too much like a $ sign. One of my favourite initial designs was the one with the capital 'M' as this gave the logotype a sense of power without being too 'in your face' as such.

The feedback I received during the group crit was surprisingly that generally people thought that the mixed case version worked best aesthetically, which shocked me as I personally disagree.

 fig1.


I also tried out some initial designs digitally, which made it easier for me to play around with kerning (see fig2 below). I immediately decided I personally preferred the logotypes in lowercase as I felt this was less harsh and more friendly and approachable. I also created a few variations that included lightening bolts in place of the 'S's and 'I' in the word, which I felt worked better in some examples than others.

During the group crit, I received feedback that the lowercase variations did look more approachable and friendly as I expected. They also said that I should experiment by removing the tittle from the 'I's and instead using the actual lightening bolts as the 'I'. Ben also suggested I make the bolts smaller so that they were less of an eyesore.


 fig2.


I also played around with form and layout and tried a few logotypes where the word was divided and placed into a particular structure. I don't think this worked very well as it made the word too disjointed and I also worry that this would not fit well onto products, labels, packaging etc. It was just  simply too impractical (see fig3 below).

The peers in my group crit also agreed with me by saying these designs would be quite hard to manipulate, but they did say that they quite liked  the large 3x4 uppercase version as it appeared quite striking and bold.

 fig3.

I am going to take the feedback from this crit into consideration and adapt my designs accordingly using my peer's feedback as a helping hand. This will help inform my designs and push them further in the right direction.













Studio Brief 01 - Analysis of electrical company logos



 The word I have been given is 'transmission'.  I started looking at different definitions for this particular word, which ranged from the transmission of diseases such as HIV to the transmission signals from radio and television.

After some quick research, I decided to go with the electrical side of things as I felt this would be easier to communicate and explore a range of ideas with. Following this, I have decided to brand an electrical appliances retailer, selling electrical components such as light bulbs, cables, plugs etc.

To help with development of my logotype, I have chosen to analyse a few different logos for already existing electrical appliance companies.


DC Electrical Company:



The D & C have an instant visual impact - this is what you are immediately drawn to once you look at the logo. Combining these letters with a slight bit of imagery creates adds a more relaxed element to the text, making it clear exactly what the company's focus is by including a lightening bolt and a plug - both naturally affiliated with electricity. The text is in a bold, sans serif font which creates a high visual impact and demonstrates the company's sharp, straight to the point focus. The italic text also adds an element of movement - relating to a flowing electrical current. The red and black colours work effectively as they are fairly simple yet the red adds an extra eye catching element, whilst ensuring the logo still works in a grayscale variation.


The Electric Company:




This logo's main focus is on the 'E' in 'electric' - it resembles a power on/off button, which helps demonstrate what the company is about. I dislike how there has been different typefaces used in this one particular logo type - both the words 'the' and 'company' are in a blocky, sharp sans serif font, yet neither are the same size or weight. The 'the' looks very stretched out and distorted, decreasing legibility. Alongside this, the softer, rounded letters of the 'electric' look odd and out of place - almost as if they are for a different company altogether. I am also unsure as to why the 'company' text is in a bar at the bottom - this makes the logo disjointed and takes away from the power button 'e' which is meant to be the main focus. Overall I think this is an ineffective logo due to the combined variety of type and styles - the only positive for this particular design is I think the colours are fairly suitable, and I like the contrast of the light and dark blue.


Positive Electrical:


This logotype immediately stands out for me, firstly because of the colours used - the dark grey creates a softer, more visually pleasing background, less harsh than a black. This is nicer to look at and also engages the eye. The flashes of yellow used also attracts attention and adds colour without being too bold. This logotype would also work well in grayscale which is a crucial element within its design. I like the consistency of using the same typeface for both words, but changing the style slightly adds an extra visual element. The simple imagery highlights the focus of the brand without it becoming too complicated.



Studio Brief 01 - Futura Research



 The typeface I have chosen for my logotype is Futura.  I felt this would be most appropriate for my electrical company logo as its clean, crisp forms reflect the appearance of efficiency and forwardness, which is exactly how I want to represent my brand.

Futura was created by Paul Renner and his main focus was avoiding including any non-essential elements within the typeface. He believed that a modern typeface should express modern models. Futura was inspired by the Bauhaus movement which follows the idea that form and function destroys ornamentals and clutter. This is a great thing as it makes my company come across as more professional and very straight to the point. The typeface is clean, standardised and legible and its basic geometric proportions ensure there are no serifs or frills.

Futura is a very popular font and is used in many big brands such as Volkswagen, Domino's Pizza, Absolut Vodka, Crayola and IKEA. Futura was also the first typeface on the moon as it was used in a commemorative plaque left by the astronauts of Apollo II in 1961.


Image result for futura

Thursday, 13 October 2016

Studio Brief 01 - Typeface Research




We have been given a choice of six typefaces to use for our logotype. These are:

- Garamond
- Bodoni
- Century
- Futura
- Times New Roman
- Helvetica

I decided to do a short bit of research into these typefaces to help inform my design decision.

Garamond:
- Created by French punch-cutter Claude Garamond
- Today's Garamond based around modern interpretations of the punches of Claude
- Garamond was the first to deviate from purely handwritten style letters to make a typeface read better when printed
- Letterforms thin and delicate
- Orante and decorative
- Large counters in a/e
- Horizontal crossbar
- Long ascenders and descenders
- Used in Harry Potter and Dr Seuss books, Google's original logo, Abercrombie & Fitch logo, etc

Bodoni:
- Designed by Giambattista Bodoni, Italy, in early 19th century
- Highly influenced by geometry
- Romantic style typeface
- Extreme contrasts between thick & thin strokes
- Subtly bracketed serifs
- Long ascenders and descenders
- Ornate appearance

Century:
- Specifically designed for Century Magazine
- Known for its extremely easy readability
- Weights, heights and spaces carefully determined
- Large open kerning

Futura:
- Inspired by the Bauhaus movement
- Function over form
- Based on elemental geometry
- 'O' - perfect circle
- J - no curve, just a straight line
- Clean crips forms
- No serifs or frills

Times New Roman:
- Similar to Plantin
- Sharper serifs, higher contrast with stroke weights
- Short ascenders and descenders
- Bracketed sharp serifs

Helvetica:
- Most neutral typeface
- Swiss style
- Clarity, precision, objectivity
- Large x-height
- 'O' - oval rather than circular
- Lowercase a - double story
- A is in teardrop shape

Tuesday, 11 October 2016

Studio Brief 01 - Study Task 02 - Kerndown




 For this task, we had to pick out 3-5 letters from the box of type. This could be a random combination of letters or make up a particular word. Our group chose the word 'Hedge' as we wanted a mixture of a capital letter, an ascender and a descender.

We were then given different types of companies by Simon, and had 60 seconds to arrange the letters in a way that best represented the given company.

Our first company given was a 'luxury car brand'. We chose to have the letters widely spaced with a loose kerning, replication other brands such as Range Rover and Porsche. This gave a high-end, luxurious sense to the type and we felt this was most appropriate for this particular company (see fig1 below).

   fig1.


Our second one given was a budget food company. We decided to bring the letters in, close but not touching. This replicated the way the word would appear if it was just typed out in a standard format. The idea was to keep it simple and basic, as a budget food company is (see fig2 below).

  fig2.


The third company were given was a condom company. We decided to keep the kerning fairly tight again but instead tilted both 'e's so that they were on a slight angle. This meant that the overall word was fairly clean, safe and trustworthy but there was a playful element added with the titled 'e' (see fig3 below).

 fig3.

The next thing we were given was an indie band. We struggled more with this one as we felt restricted by our particular word and letter forms. Eventually we chose to have an extremely tight kerning, so that all the letters were touching. We felt this gave a more 'unique' vibe than a standard kerning width. Afterwards we realised a better idea would have been to put the 'e's the wrong way round or even upside down to add a funky, edgy element (see fig4 below).

  fig4.

Finally, we were given an IT company. With this, we decided on a looser kerning, but not too wide. We again went for close, but not touching. This was a very simple, straightforward style to reflect the plain, serious element of an IT company (see fig5 below).

  fig5.


Study Task 01 - Punctuation, Ligatures & Emojis



 
The main objective for this brief was to design and develop a new character for a typeface of your choice. This could be on a large or small scale, with no language barriers and it had to work in grayscale.

Initially myself and Danielle began looking at slang/text talk used in everyday life, such as 'lol'. We drew out a variety of initial designs but we eventually came to the conclusion that these particular designs were too much like symbols, rather than ligatures. Please refer to fig1 below.

  fig1.



We then chose to move on and look at 'ft', meaning 'featuring', usually found in the middle of song names when listing the artists. With this being a small, short abbreviation, we thought we could combine the two letters into one ligature. We began by creating a variety of initial ideas (see fig2 below).

  fig2.

We decided that simply tightening the kerning and making the F closer to the T was too obvious so we decided to go with a more unique approach, using the crossbar from the F as the top of the T too.
I particularly really liked this idea so we chose to develop and refine it by placing it on a grid and playing around with spacing. This allowed us to see it in a more linear sense and meant we could experiment with calculated spacing (see fig3 below).

  fig3.

One issue that did arise is that we didn't think it would work as well in a serif or script font. I began playing around with different styles of writing it, and experimented by repeatedly drawing out our chosen ligature in my own handwriting.  I found that this made the ligature less effective as it lost its initial boldness and wasn't as striking (see fig4 below).

  fig4.

Following this discovery, we chose to go back to basics and work with our very first original ideas - placing the F and T very close together. After some discussion, we decided to try removing the crossbar to create a unique style, and we thought it looked particularly effective. After our group crit, we received feedback that this design in particular was the most effective so this became our chosen final design. The feedback was to try it in a serif font, so we did this afterwards as some extra experimentation as well as a bold, script and regular style (see fig5 below).

  fig5.



  Left: fig6. demonstrating final design vectorised
                                                                                  in Illustrator.

This particular task made me think about ways in which type and text can be adapted and what effect this has on certain words and meanings. This will definitely be useful in future projects and I can refer back to the exploration from this brief. To improve my future work, I would like to spend more time developing initial ideas as this would give me a better choice of options to take forward.