After creating my pictograms and choosing my typeface, I decided to use a very basic, structural arrow within my wayfinding system. I picked this particular shape and style of arrow because I felt it matched the aesthetic of both my typeface and pictograms very well. It is clear, simple and legible, which is exactly how I want my sign system to be so it is accessible for all ages.
I experimented by placing the pictograms from each generation onto the appropriately coloured arrows. I liked this idea as it was a way of directing people around the route without using any text, which I thought was interesting. These arrows would be placed on the ground in a supergraphic style, or potentially even going up walls etc.
I also made some basic square signs that would be mounted/stuck onto walls around the routes. I included Yorkshire dialect within these signs which helped make links back to the Yorkshire roots/culture surrounding Leeds and my family.


I also created some posters that would potentially be flyers. These flyers would be picked up by people following the route to give some basic background information of what places they would be visiting and whereabouts they are. Along with this, I designed some signs that would be mounted on walls etc where these places were. For example, Vallances is no longer there, so instead there would be this sign on the wall to show where it once was.
After showing all my final ideas to my group in the final crit, the feedback they gave me was that the posters/place signs did not match the aesthetic as my other pictograms and designs.
They said the posters were quite wordy and that there was too much going on - it did not match with my simple aesthetic for my other designs. They suggested simplifying these posters in order to help them match my other work.
Taking these comments on board, I am going to make some final adjustments to my designs to ensure everything is tied in correctly and matches up as one system,